Tag Archives: ACTU

National inquiry into pregnancy and return to work

National inquiry into pregnancy and return to work

Pregnant woman
Photo: flickr/Kit4na

Despite laws and policies in Australia protecting employees against discrimination while pregnant, seeking parental leave or returning to work after parental leave, many people are often demoted, forced to resign, made redundant or receive unfavourable treatment during this time.

Unions hear these stories all the time, but we need to let decision-makers in government know about them too.

The Australian Human Rights Commission is now conducting an inquiry into pregnancy at work and returning to work after parental leave.

The ACTU will be making a submission, and we want about people’s experiences. Click below to find out how.

National inquiry into pregnancy and return to work

Women miss out on $165 a week, thanks to gender pay gap

Herald/ Sun article on the impact on the Gender Pay Gap to women’s earnings. Click link to read more.

 

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/money/money-matters/women-miss-out-on-165-a-week-thanks-to-gender-pay-gap/story-fni0ctkz-1226687163943

Childcare educators push historic case: Age Article

Childcare educators push historic case

Illustration: Matt Golding.

Illustration: Matt Golding.

The value of work done by childcare educators will be tested in a historic equal-pay case to be lodged with the industrial arbiter on Monday.

United Voice, the union representing childcare workers, will lodge a claim with the Fair Work Commission arguing that educators are paid less than people with comparable qualifications because of an outdated and sexist notion that childcare is something done by women in the home.

”If this were 68,000 blokes, there’s no way they’d be paid $19 an hour,” the national president of United Voice, Michael Crosby, said.

”Women have got choices. They’re not confined to teaching or nursing any more, and it’s only rational they would want to choose a career, not a minimum-wage job.”

The claim is the next step in the campaign to lift the wages of a group of workers who are among the lowest paid in the country.

A childcare educator with a Certificate III qualification is paid $19.07 an hour, about $10 an hour less than someone with comparable qualifications working in another area.

The claim asks that Certificate III qualified staff receive a $10 an hour pay increase, with lower per-hour increases for people with higher levels of qualifications.

The claim covers the 68,000 people working in childcare, not just those who are union members.

”Should the commission agree with the union’s claim, it would be up to the government of the day to decide whether or not it was prepared to provide funding to cover increased wages,” Mr Crosby said.

The union estimates that this would cost $1.4 billion a year, based on what happened last year following a successful claim made by the Australian Services Union covering about 120,000 workers in social and community service organisations.

”Our members are determined that the outcome shouldn’t be that parents end up paying for this increase. That would be utterly unfair,” Mr Crosby said.

Childcare centres are trying to meet new government regulations requiring them to employ more staff with higher qualifications. Turnover of staff in centres is typically high, with many citing low pay as the reason they leave.

The claim builds on the federal government’s recent offer of $300 million to fund wage increases.

But the plan has been controversial because it will only provide for pay increases of about $3 an hour for 40 per cent of workers until June 2015.

Melbourne childcare worker Kerrie Devir said she was used to seeing fellow workers stay for ”five or 10 years, then leave for a better paid job”.

”Early childhood education should be this intensely important time and we can only do so much on our own.”

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/childcare-educators-push-historic-case-20130713-2px3l.html#ixzz2Z0adrkIy

ACTU Summit on Decent Jobs and a Better Society

Summit logo

This event sought to bring unions, NGOs, academics and others together not only to highlight the damaging social effects that insecure work causes but more importantly  to start to develop some solutions. See Ged Kearney, president of the ACTU’s  speech here.

Veronica presenting at the ACTU summit

Veronica presenting on women and precarious work

Veronica Sheen from Monash University and member of the FDW steering group highlighted the importance of secure work as a gender equality indicator. She argues:

Employment security needs to become a core Gender Equality Indicator and subject to the sort of recurrent inspection and accountability as the gender pay gap. Indicators make explicit where there are deficits in outcomes for socially agreed objectives and serve as a basis for advocacy and improved policy. Employment security as a Gender Equality Indicator could also lend its weight in achieving the recommendations of the Independent Inquiry, and more broadly a range of public policies across employment and social welfare, which would benefit everyone. See the paper by Veronica Sheen for more.

JuJulie Kun chaired the session on poverty and social inclusionlie Kun (from WIRE and member of the FDW steering group) chaired the panel on poverty and social inclusion.

Panelists included Jill Biddington, Panel member of the Independent Inquiry into Insecure Work;  Michelle O’Neil, National Secretary TCFUA; Dr Dina Bowman, Brotherhood of St Laurence (and FDW steering group member); Kara Keys, ACTU Indigenous Officer.  

The summit was a good opportunity to highlight the issues that affect women (and men) – including the need for social infrastructure such as child care; access to affordable housing; safe and affordable transport; and adequate income support that recognizes the changed nature of work and families – as well as decent jobs.

The FDW steering group will be meeting in Melbourne later this month to discuss next steps.

Time to care

The ACTU has launched a campaign about the right to request time to care. They’re calling for:

  1.  All employees with caring responsibilities, older workers and workers experiencing domestic violence to have the right to request a change in work arrangements;
  2. An obligation on employers to genuinely consider the request (which can be refused on reasonable business grounds); and
  3. The right for an employee to appeal an unreasonable refusal of their request.

Currently, the right to request flexible hours is limited to parents with responsibility for a child under school age or a child with disability aged under 18. Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations Bill Shorten recently announced broadening of the current right to request.

Workers who can make right to request flexible work arrangements will be extended to include:

  • workers with caring responsibilities
  • employees who are parents, or who have responsibility for the care of a child of school age
  • employees with disability
  • mature-age employees
  • workers experiencing family violence and workers providing personal care, support and assistance to a member of their immediate family or member of their household because they are experiencing family violence.

The Government will also amend the Fair Work Information Statement provided to every new employee to ensure they are aware of their rights to request flexible work arrangements.

The ACTU points out:

  1. Without an obligation on employer to treat the requests seriously, or the right for an employee to appeal an unreasonable refusal, the Fair Work Act’s right to request a change in work arrangements provision lacks real meaning and remains not much more than the right to ask for something.
  2. The amendments only require employers to seriously consider an employee’s request and employees may only appeal unreasonable refusals (such as where an employer says we don’t want to consider your request at all).  Reasonable employers who consider a request but nevertheless cannot accommodate it have nothing to worry about.

They are calling for further amendments of the Fair Work Act to address the issues above. They have produced  a fact sheet that spells out the key issues. Flexible working arrangements that enable people to manage care responsibilities are a key factor in safeguarding women’s economic security and equal opportunity.

The ACTU cites data that suggest:

  • The majority of families now have both parents working;
  •  4.1 million employees combine work with caring responsibilities;
  • The second highest issue listed by both men and women in the 2012 ACTU Census was balancing work and family;
  • The results of the Inquiry into Insecure Work showed that many employees (especially women) who were denied family friendly working arrangements were being forced in to low paid, insecure jobs;
  • Labour force participation of Australians over 55 has grown from around one quarter (24%) to one third (34%) over the past 10 years, and the trend is predicted to continue; and
  • Two thirds of women who suffer domestic violence are working in the paid labour force

The ACTU National Community Summit: Creating Secure Jobs & a Better Future provides a great opportunity to discuss these issues further.

National community summit on insecure work in Australia in Canberra

This summit is designed to be the next step in building an ongoing alliance of community groups, academics, think tanks and unions in prosecuting our agenda for secure jobs and a good society.

The summit aims to provide a vehicle to build a collaboration with civil society on the recommendations of the Independent Inquiry into Insecure Work in Australia, chaired by former Deputy Prime Minister Brian Howe.

Speakers include: Ged Kearney, Dave Oliver, Brian Howe, Cassandra Goldie, John Falzon and John Buchanan for more information see: Secure Jobs-National-Community-Summit

When: 13-14 March, 2013
Where: Old Parliament House, Canberra
Contact: summit@actu.org.au

Resources

economic Security4women
ACTU Independent Inquiry into Insecure Work
International Labour Organisation

Brotherhood of St Laurence

Work+ Family Policy Roundtable

The Conversation

Conference papers
Social risks of precarious work for women
Books
Gender and the contours of precarious employment
Beyond employment